The explanations for all ten questions sit on this sheet. Pick an answer on the left and the matching card lights up.
-
T5A01 Explanation 1
Key B — 30 to 300 MHz
Between 30 and 300 MHz the uncontrolled limit is 0.2 milliwatts per square centimetre, the lowest value in the whole table. Human bodies resonate electrically in this range and absorb RF more efficiently, which is why 6 metres and 2 metres carry the strictest public limit.
Rule 47 CFR §97.13(c) and §1.1310 - RF exposure limits
-
T5A02 Explanation 2
Key A — 1 milliwatt per square centimetre
In a controlled environment, where the person is aware of the field and can leave, 30 to 300 MHz allows 1 mW/cm2 averaged over six minutes. The uncontrolled limit for the same band is five times lower at 0.2 mW/cm2 averaged over thirty minutes.
Rule 47 CFR §1.1310 Table 1 - controlled exposure
-
T5A03 Explanation 3
Key D — The maximum electric and magnetic field strength or power density a person may be exposed to
The limits constrain the field a person is exposed to, not the transmitter's output. That is why the same 100 watt transmitter can be entirely legal on one antenna installation and non-compliant on another with more gain or a lower mounting height.
Rule 47 CFR §1.1310 - radiofrequency radiation exposure limits
-
T5A04 Explanation 4
Key C — Whenever the station is changed in a way that could increase exposure, such as more power, more antenna gain or a lower antenna
The evaluation tracks the installation, not the calendar. Adding an amplifier, swapping a dipole for a beam, moving the antenna closer to an accessible area or starting to operate on a new band all change the field, so the evaluation has to be repeated before operating.
Rule 47 CFR §97.13(c)(1) - routine evaluation
-
T5A05 Explanation 5
Key B — Increasing the distance between people and the antenna
Power density falls with the square of distance, so moving from two metres away to four metres away reduces exposure by a factor of four - far more than a small power reduction, and without sacrificing coverage the way backing off the power does.
Rule 47 CFR §97.13(c)(2) - exposure mitigation
-
T5A06 Explanation 6
Key A — Electric shock caused by current leaking from the circuit to ground
A GFCI compares the current leaving and returning on the two conductors and trips within milliseconds when they differ by a few milliamperes, which is the signature of current flowing through a person to earth. It is essential in any damp location where a shack is likely to be.
Rule 47 CFR §97.13(a) - station safety
-
T5A07 Explanation 7
Key D — It keeps all equipment at the same potential so surges do not travel through the equipment between two grounds
If two pieces of equipment are grounded at different points, a strike or surge raises one above the other and the difference drives current through the interconnect cables - and through the transceiver. Bonding everything to one bus removes that path.
Rule 47 CFR §97.13(a) - good engineering practice
-
T5A08 Explanation 8
Key C — That no part of the antenna or its support can contact a power line, even if it falls
Contact with a power line is the leading cause of fatal accidents in amateur radio. The requirement is a fall zone: if the mast or a guy can come down across a power line, the installation is unsafe no matter how good the SWR is.
Rule 47 CFR §97.13(a) - antenna installation safety
-
T5A09 Explanation 9
Key B — A long antenna can hold a dangerous static charge even with the radio switched off
Wind and nearby weather build up static on an antenna and its feed line, and the charge has nowhere to go until something - possibly you - provides a path to earth. Shorting the line at the shack end bleeds it off safely before you touch anything.
Rule 47 CFR §97.13(a) - working safely on antenna systems
-
T5A10 Explanation 10
Key B — Only if it falls within the FCC's categorical exemption, based on frequency, power and antenna gain
The FCC exempts stations that plainly cannot exceed the limits - low power on the higher bands, for example - and publishes a table of the power and gain combinations that qualify. Everything outside the exemption needs an evaluation, which may be done by calculation rather than measurement.
Rule 47 CFR §97.13(c)(1) - categorical exemption